
Mounir Laggoune is the co-founder and CEO of Finary, a French wealth management application. Research surrounding his compensation and wealth is increasing, but no official public data allows for a precise calculation of his salary or personal wealth.
Mounir Laggoune’s Illiquid Wealth: What It Means to Hold Startup Shares
To understand the concept of wealth as applied to a startup founder, it is essential to distinguish between two realities. The first is liquid assets: bank accounts, stock investments, savings accounts. The second is illiquid wealth, consisting of shares in a non-listed company.
In the case of Mounir Laggoune, most of what some websites refer to as “wealth” corresponds to his shares in Finary. These shares are not freely tradable on a market. Their value depends on a theoretical estimate, usually set during a fundraising round, and not on a stock price updated in real-time.
In practical terms, this wealth cannot be accessed without a liquidity event: a sale of the company, an initial public offering, or a secondary buyout of shares. As long as none of these scenarios occur, the valuation remains hypothetical. A founder can therefore appear “rich” on paper while receiving a modest salary in daily life.
Several recent analyses explicitly acknowledge that all assessments of Mounir Laggoune’s wealth are speculative and not declarative. Neither the published accounts of Finary nor legal databases like BODACC provide any indication of his salary or dividends. Anyone wishing to delve deeper into Mounir Laggoune’s salary and wealth encounters this lack of verifiable data.

CEO Salary in Fintech in France: Structural Benchmarks
No official amount of Mounir Laggoune’s salary has been made public. This is not unusual. In France, executives of non-listed companies (especially SAS) have no obligation to publish their individual compensation.
Some benchmarks help frame the discussion without inventing figures:
- In a growth-phase startup, the salary of the founder-CEO is often set by the board of directors and remains moderate compared to the market, as the priority is reinvestment in the product and the team.
- Founders compensate for this limited remuneration through their equity holdings, which increase in value over successive fundraising rounds.
- Dividends are rarely paid in the early years of a fintech, as cash flow is absorbed by technical development and user acquisition.
Applying these general principles to Finary remains an exercise in deduction. Without access to general meeting minutes or detailed accounts, any estimation is speculative.
Content Creator and Author Income: A Parallel Wealth
Articles analyzing Mounir Laggoune’s financial situation focus almost exclusively on Finary. They overlook a significant component: his activities as a content creator and author.
Finary’s YouTube channel, led by Mounir Laggoune, has accumulated over 150 million views. The claimed community reaches about one million people. These audiences generate advertising revenue, the exact amount of which is not public, but represents a recurring income stream.
The Book as an Economic Asset
His book, Investing to Be Free, is presented as a best-seller that has been reissued several times. A successful book in the personal finance field generates royalties on each copy sold, and then on each reissue. This income adds to any potential salary and the shares held in Finary.
Mounir Laggoune also regularly appears on BFM Business in the show “Everything to Invest.” This type of media presence, while not directly remunerative at the level of a salary, contributes to the value of his personal brand. This notoriety in turn fuels downloads of the app and book sales.

Finary: Valuation of the Fintech and Impact on Estimated Wealth
The value attributed to Mounir Laggoune’s shares directly depends on Finary’s valuation during its funding rounds. At each fundraising, a price per share is set in agreement with investors. This price then serves as the basis for wealth estimates.
Two nuances should be kept in mind:
- The post-money valuation of a funding round reflects an agreement between investors and founders at a given moment, not the actual resale value of the company.
- Preferred liquidation clauses, common in venture capital, mean that investors recover their investment first during an exit. The founder only receives their share after them.
- Dilution occurs at each new funding round: the founder’s ownership percentage mechanically decreases, even if the unit value of their shares increases.
The estimated wealth of a startup founder fluctuates at each fundraising and can also drop sharply if the company no longer raises funds or revises its valuation downward (a “down round”).
Why Entrepreneur Wealth Estimates Are Unreliable
The proliferation of “wealth of…” articles applied to French startup founders relies on a fragile method. It consists of multiplying the supposed ownership percentage by the last known valuation.
This approach ignores shareholder agreements (which may limit the transfer of shares), liquidation preferences, applicable taxation in the event of a sale, and the simple fact that a real buyer would not necessarily pay the theoretical price of the last round.
No official source confirms Mounir Laggoune’s wealth. Publicly accessible financial databases (Societe.com, Pappers, BODACC) do not publish individual compensation for SAS executives. Only an IPO or a voluntary declaration would change the situation.
The case of Mounir Laggoune illustrates a common gap in the French startup ecosystem: the perceived value of a founder rests on unrealized assets, while their actual income, including salary and royalties, remains shrouded in private data.